Rogerian argument is often difficult for students to understand because it asks them to think about controversial topics in a different way: from the perspective of someone they disagree with. The discussions that follow are meant to help you understand the reason for and the components of an argument in Rogerian style. On Finding Common Ground Freebase ( / 0 votes)Rate this definition: Rogerian argument is a conflict solving technique based on finding common ground instead of polarizing debate. Baumlin describes the Rogerian Argument: "The Rogerian strategy, in which participants in a discussion collaborate to find areas of shared experience, thus allows speaker and audience to open 3/24/ · Rogerian argument - definition Simply put, a Rogerian argument is a negotiation technique in which common viewpoints and goals are identified. Opposing views and plans are also recognized, and using a logical approach, common ground is reached to resolve those differences and reach an agreement/5()
How to Write a Rogerian Argument
A Rogerian Argument is a special way of leading a debate after which both opposing sides stand nearer each other, instead of being in collision or refusing to continue their discussion, rogerian argument definition.
In our world of global technologies it becomes more and more difficult to expose logical arguments while debating with others.
Carl Rogers, the creator of this approach, has elaborated it in order to make people listen to each rogerian argument definition and reach an agreement without retreating too far from their points of view. The method can be used in oral discussions as well as in written form. A Rogerian Argument is rogerian argument definition special method of discussion through which the opponents express their points of view confidently and fully, without saving any part of it.
Their goal, though, is not to convince the opponent, but rather to have the discussion in such a way as to stand nearer the truth, or nearer a common position.
Warning : a Rogerian Argument is to be employed as regards of issues which are not of entirely objective nature. Such a discussion, for instance, cannot be held regarding the fact that the Solar system is heliocentric because this is a fact beyond any dispute - it can only be repudiated by experiments, and not by expressing opinions.
Therefore, the Rogerian Argument is to be used in spheres which are subjective, such as moral, political, social, economic, rogerian argument definition, religious, etc. A Rogerian Argument is to be employed as regards of issues which are not of entirely objective nature. It should be used in spheres which are subjective, rogerian argument definition, such as moral, rogerian argument definition, political, social, economic, religious, etc.
Tweet This. The essence of the Rogerian Argument is found in its perception of personal experience as fundamental for having a proper and fruitful discussion. Personal experience often leads people to different standpoints; rogerian argument definition that reason it is important to understand the experience of the other. Instead of putting stress only on the logical side of the discussion, rogerian argument definition, Rogers prefers giving opportunity to both opponents to share their worldview and values, after which they would be able to understand each other better.
This is not a real discussion or debate because usually, during either of them, both sides can interrupt each other, or can offer additional arguments or repudiate the other's arguments. A Rogerian Argument consists of three main parts: the first of which is the stage when you present the view of your opponent - that is, if you start first, you should present the other's point of view, and not your own. The second part is expressing your own opinion, and the final part is comparing both positions and finding similarities between them.
A Rogerian Argument consists of 3 main parts: 1 presenting the view of your opponent; 2 expressing your own opinion, and 3 comparing both positions and finding similarities between them. You have to know that the view of your opponent should be presented as objectively as possible. You need to observe the following rules:.
It is good to read about the view of your opponent prior to having the discussion or writing the argument. It rogerian argument definition also recommended to speak to your opponent in order to clarify their ideas.
As you see, it is quite important to formulate the topic precisely. Then it will be easy to formulate your own standpoint. Remember: when the topic is vaguely formulated it is too long or too abstracta true discussion is impossible. As it was already mentioned, you should avoid personal attacks. This also indicates subjective feelings, expressing your emotions, employing moral categories i.
X is bad. Your task is not to preach but to expose good arguments in support of your thesis, at the same time having respect for your opponent.
Context of the problem : During the Civil War in Syria since millions of people have fled from the country and have looked for an asylum in Europe, Canada and the United States. Currently, a debate is held regarding the problem: should the United States take refugees from Syria? The thesis exposed by Mr, rogerian argument definition. X can be summarized as follows: the United States should not provide Syrians with asylum because most of them are dangerous.
Some of them belong to terrorist organizations; others express sympathy for radical Islam and extremism. Their presence in this country will strengthen the terrorist network and will threaten the security of America. Only a limited number of refugees from Syria rogerian argument definition be accepted, mostly women and children, as well as highly trained professionals teachers, doctors, etc. Refugees fleeing from the war in Syria should be taken in the United States because they need help rogerian argument definition support.
They could be accommodated in special centers for refugees, rogerian argument definition also trained to find a job in the United States. Most of the refugees are normal people with normal life.
They did not flee in order to organize terrorist attacks, but they rather run away from the terrorists who are now in control of some parts of Syria. The similarities shared by both points of view are the following: first, there are terrorists in the world planning attacks also in America; and second, at least some number rogerian argument definition refugees could be taken in America. Now, the problem is how to define who has the right to asylum: only doctors, teachers, rogerian argument definition, and other people with university degrees; or mostly women and children; or all Syrians who are confirmed to be real refugees to be taken in America.
The first point could also be addressed by both theses: some of the Syrian refugees are also afraid of terrorists, thus they could help to fight terrorism. You can support all this information by adding quotations - excerpts from texts written by your opponent, as well as articles, monographs, rogerian argument definition, opinions presented on the forums, etc.
You have to support your theses with data, statistics, or any kind of reliable information for example, to show what is the percentage of terrorists among the refugees from Syria. When writing a Rogerian essaythe key things to keep in mind are your main points for your argument and the opposing views.
To start your Rogerian essay, you will need to research your topic and fully understand it. This rogerian argument definition help you to formalize the main points for your argument and identify any opposing rogerian argument definition. In doing this, you will also be able to critically analyze these views and draft your ideas for them.
For your Rogerian essay thesis statement, you will need to state your main point in the form of a thesis statement. Make sure that rogerian argument definition indicate your viewpoint and propose a solution to the issue. APA or MLA format can be used when writing your Rogerian essay. Good Rogerian topics are the ones that have several viewpoints and can be argued from a proposing and opposing side. Here are 20 good topics for writing a Rogerian essay. The Rogerian argument seeks to discuss both opposing and proposing sides of an argument, while the Rogerian classical argument aims to disprove the opposing views.
A classical argument is one that the writer aims to persuade the reader and having them agree with their points. However, in a Rogerian argument, rogerian argument definition, the author seeks to have the reader understand the issues. The Rogerian argument discusses the proposing and opposing viewpoints with the aim of the reader being able to understand the issues.
Rogerian arguments rely on moral and ethical reasoning to support the viewpoints of the author while Toulmin arguments are supported by empirical data and logical reasoning. Tweets by SolidEssay. Custom Writing How it Works Prices F. Share this article: Tweet. Get your original paper! We Accept. Our Guarantees. Customer Feedback I had several assignments to be turned in during one week and I just wouldn't be able to manage it myself. Thank you for helping me out. You did a great job. read more.
Want to make your first order? Services Custom Essay Writing Prices Discount Policy Support Frequently Asked Questions Contact Us. About Us Company Testimonials Sitemap Writers Apply as a Writer.
Intro to Argument/Rogerian Argument
, time: 8:10Rogerian Argument - Definition and Introduction | blogger.com
A Rogerian argument is also called the "common ground" argument because this method requires you to identify the ideas, beliefs and arguments you and your audience share in common. The assumption, therefore, is that you and your intended audience share common ideas, beliefs and arguments. Hence, the task is to identify these commonalities and use them to further argue. File Size: 9KB Freebase ( / 0 votes)Rate this definition: Rogerian argument is a conflict solving technique based on finding common ground instead of polarizing debate. Baumlin describes the Rogerian Argument: "The Rogerian strategy, in which participants in a discussion collaborate to find areas of shared experience, thus allows speaker and audience to open Rogerian Argument Definition A Rogerian Argument is a special method of discussion through which the opponents express their points of view confidently and fully, without saving any part of it. Their goal, though, is not to convince the opponent, but rather to have the discussion in such a way as to stand nearer the truth, or nearer a common position
No comments:
Post a Comment